
The Australian Government has introduced a change to the Employer Nomination Scheme (Subclass 186) TRT stream, which may affect organisations employing Medical Practitioners, CEOs, Corporate General Managers, and Managing Directors.
This change is part of the Migration Amendment (Skilled Visa Reform Technical Measures) Regulations 2025, coming into effect 29 November 2025.
Previously, employees in exempt occupations could count time spent working in their nominated occupation with a non-sponsoring employer toward the two-year employment requirement for the TRT stream.
From 29 November 2025, this will no longer be allowed.
Now, the entire two-year qualifying period must be completed with an approved work sponsor. Only employment with a business holding an approved Standard Business Sponsorship will count toward eligibility for permanent residency under the TRT stream.
Example:
A medical practitioner on a SC482 visa has spent:
Under current rules, both years could be combined to meet the two-year TRT requirement for a Subclass 186 visa.
From 29 November 2025, only the year with the approved sponsor will count. Any time with a non-sponsoring employer will no longer contribute to the two-year requirement.
Anyone who has already lodged their Subclass 186 TRT application before 29 November 2025 will not be impacted.
1. Lodging applications before 29 November 2025
Employees in exempt occupations who are relying on time with a non-sponsoring employer should submit their Subclass 186 TRT application before 29 November 2025.
2. Visa holders not yet eligible
If you cannot meet the two-year requirement before the deadline and are not employed by an approved sponsor, action is needed:
3. Employer workforce review
Employers should:
✅ MARN 1679969 | QEAC M628
The information provided is a general guide and does not constitute legal or immigration advice; there are many regulations that may apply depending on each individual’s circumstances alongside changes in the industry. It is the user’s responsibility to verify the currency of information. Those seeking advice should engage a MARA registered migration agent.
👉 Book an appointment with Eleonora (speaks English and Italian) https://calendly.com/d/438-vkq-24s
👉 Book an appointment with Stefania (speaks English and Italian) https://calendly.com/d/3n6-9b7-svm
👉 Book an appointment with Vikas (speaker Hindi, English and Punjabi) https://calendly.com/d/cnq5-k7y-b35
✅ Stay Connected With Us:
👉 Instagram: / greenwings_migration
👉 LinkedIn: / green-wings-migration
👉 Facebook: / greenwingsmigration
📩 For business inquiries: info@greenwingsmigration.com.au
✅ MARN 1679969 | QEAC M628 🏆 Best Migration Agency in Western Australia for 2023 by APAC Legal Awards
For 186 TRT Only, the Department will focus only on the employment side. The extra income coming from dividends generated by international investments are not going to be investigated.
Offshore income is a matter of taxation/accountancy.
3 Comments
This is a very timely update regarding the 186 TRT stream, especially with the 29 November deadline approaching—thanks for breaking down the “approved sponsor” requirement so clearly. I’ve been looking into similar residency pathways for a colleague who is considering Europe as a backup option, and we stumbled upon the Spanish NIE system. Since you’re experts in migration, do you know if having a Spanish identification number like the one described here https://e-residence.com/de/nie-spain-online/ would simplify the process for an Australian PR holder looking to establish a business presence in the EU, or are the two systems completely decoupled in terms of eligibility?
Hi Elisa, thanks for the detailed breakdown of these changes to the 186 TRT stream. The shift to requiring the full two years with an approved sponsor is definitely a game-changer for many medical practitioners here in WA. I’m currently helping a colleague gather documentation for their application before the November deadline, and we’re looking into how offshore financial assets or side income might be viewed during the broader permanent residency assessment. For instance, if someone has active accounts or interests in emerging digital markets abroad, like the ones discussed regarding the Chilean sector at https://guiaderojabetchile.com, would the Department of Home Affairs require a full audit of those funds to prove they were legally sourced, or does the 186 TRT focus strictly on the employment side of things? Cheers!